Especially suprageneric monomials can be used at varies ranks.
- Should these be considered different names in the nomenclatural sense or is that merely a different taxonomic usage of the same name?
- Is there a difference between botany and zoology?
- Is it sufficient to distinct family group names and genus group names and ignore the exact rank? Considering we also want to track unavailable names
For example Dianthera exists twice as a genus in IPNI:
http://beta.ipni.org/?f=f_generic&q=Dianthera
And both as a section and subsection both from the same publication, but apparently different pages: http://beta.ipni.org/?f=f_infrageneric&q=Dianthera
So this clearly demands for unique ranks in subgeneric names.
I presume we have the same case for suprageneric names
Especially suprageneric monomials can be used at varies ranks.
For example
Diantheraexists twice as a genus in IPNI:http://beta.ipni.org/?f=f_generic&q=Dianthera
And both as a section and subsection both from the same publication, but apparently different pages: http://beta.ipni.org/?f=f_infrageneric&q=Dianthera
So this clearly demands for unique ranks in subgeneric names.
I presume we have the same case for suprageneric names