Skip to content

docs: fix dead API link in README and drop link to deleted scanpy_usage repo - #4378

Open
pratikgx wants to merge 1 commit into
scverse:mainfrom
pratikgx:docs-fix-dead-links
Open

pratikgx wants to merge 1 commit into
scverse:mainfrom
pratikgx:docs-fix-dead-links

Conversation

@pratikgx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
  • Closes: no issue; dead links found while reading the docs.
  • Tests not required because: documentation links only.
  • Release notes not necessary because: no user-visible behavior change, two dead links repaired.

README: the [api section] reference used api.html; the page is api/index.html (old URL 404s, new one 200).

docs/tutorials/index.md: the "Older tutorials" section pointed only at github.com/scverse/scanpy_usage, which no longer exists (404 with no redirect; the archived scanpy-tutorials repo says tutorials now live in these docs). Removed the section rather than point it somewhere that doesn't hold those tutorials. The seealso block on spatial tutorials that followed it is kept. Happy to re-add the section if the old material lives somewhere I missed.

…ge repo

- README: the API section link used api.html; the page is api/index.html
- docs/tutorials: the Older tutorials section pointed only at the
  scverse/scanpy_usage repository, which no longer exists (no redirect,
  and the archived scanpy-tutorials repo says tutorials now live in
  these docs), so the section is removed
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.93%. Comparing base (a41e03f) to head (208dfb2).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4378   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.93%   81.93%           
=======================================
  Files         134      134           
  Lines       13030    13030           
=======================================
  Hits        10676    10676           
  Misses       2354     2354           
Flag Coverage Δ
hatch-test.low-vers 78.81% <ø> (ø)
hatch-test.pre 81.80% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant